This article is in response to a Facebook posting about Facebook “selling” personal information through their developers section. I originally tried to post this on facebook, but it has restrictive message limits, so here it is in it’s entirety. (Pardon the spelling and such, I wrote this is in a rush.)
This is the posting I found on the Facebook site, verbatim:
First of all, they aren’t selling the information, they are exposing web services. What that means is that they’ve realeased API’s to let developers write applications to extend Facebook. The developers can’t access information about you unless you log in to the application they developed. Additionally all information passess through http://api.facebook.com/, which means the developers don’t have direct acess to your passwords, so they aren’t going to steal your account information that way.
Anyone seeking to develop an application has to apply for an API key, which doesn’t cost anything, but can uniquely identify, and allow for the immediate disabling of any application written to steal data.
From the Facebook API FAQ:
“Any content delivered to the outside application can be safely displayed to the user. However, in general, content delievered when using a session key should only be stored until that session key expires, or twelve hours, whichever comes later. The exceptions to this are user ids and affiliations information. This is detailed further in the accompanying documentation.”
The opening of these API’s and web services are a contribution to the Facebook society, and something they’re doing for free. Open source programming is a great benefit to end users, and these API’s and those of other sites allow the creation of rich, dynamic and integrated web applications.
If people take the time to read and understand whats going on with the system they can see that there is noting to “be afraid” of, and that their information is just as secure as ever. Which, I’ll admit, isn’t saying much. Social networking systems such as Facebook are hugely complex systems, and Facebooks should be applauded on their content control systems. They’ve added a at least a mediocum of security to the information on their system with a complex network of “friend” relationships. Compared to other sites, Myspace for example, the security of your information inside of Facebook is commendable.
That leads to the final argument here. Even though Facebook is releasing these API’s (which are a good thing) it’s all still in your control. As the post that first sparked this response says, you can opt out. And barring that Facebook, like other web services such as Flickr, Myspace, etc. is an opt-in. You signed up, if you don’t like it that much, unsubscribe.
I apologize if this was even slightly emotionally charged, I just don’t want to see a good thing ruined because of illogical fears.
Here are some links to help understand whats actually going on.
http://developers.facebook.com/faq.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_services
And here are some example applications built on the API.
http://www.blabbook.com/
http://matchrevolution.com/
Please read and consider these. If you find a posting on Facebook that goes against the new web services, post a link to this site! We could potentially lose a great number of wonderfull social services provided by clever programmers and the Facebook API’s!
Posted September 7th, 2006 - Permalink
May 4th, 2007 at 10:37 am
I wanna start with the fact that i am a huge supporter of the the facebook api and the general opening up of data…
but what is ur response to this argument:
if i accept the terms of the api and run a simple app that for example puts all my friends on a google map, the names and contact info for all of my friends run through the developers server, who can then (illegally) store their private data and if motivated use it bad things like mailings etc…
May 7th, 2007 at 9:56 pm
You make a good point. That’s really a weakness in the web services way of doing things. You can never be certain of the security of the information you publish, even in a limited manner, anywhere on the web. Whats the solution though? Should Facebook close it’s API’s down and limit the physically relative data and contact information? That would severely hinder a good many applications that are based on the locations and relationships of the members.
I agree that there is the opportunity for misuse of the system, but that risk is inherent in publishing information anywhere, especially on the internet. I still sincerely believe that despite the possibility of foul play, the API’s are a good thing and that the alarm risen by posts like the one I replicated here are absurd and overdone. They make Facebook out as an evil empire selling their information to the highest bidder, which is the absolutely absurd.
On a side note, I like the design of the site you linked with your comment. Very sharp.